- Naming all nine light pairs correctly on the first run is a pass. If errors occur, the test is repeated and the average error count across the later runs decides the result — the pass criterion is an average of one error or fewer across those runs, per the original Navy protocol.
- Mildly color-deficient people often can — studies put the pass rate among anomalous trichromats at roughly 30%. That is by design: the FALANT is an operational aptitude test for signal-light recognition, not a clinical screen, so it intentionally passes deficiencies mild enough not to affect the task. Strong protan or deutan deficiencies are reliably caught.
- No. Effective January 1, 2025 the FAA accepts only three computer-based tests (CAD, Rabin Cone Contrast Test, Waggoner CCVT), administered in person, and lantern tests are no longer on the approved list. Pilots who passed a FALANT at a previous FAA medical are grandfathered and do not retest.
- Lantern-style and cone-contrast testing continue in military and maritime settings under each service's own rules — the OPTEC 900 is the commonly cited FALANT-equivalent in US Navy and Coast Guard contexts, and the Rabin Cone Contrast Test is used across US services. Requirements vary by service and role, so the applicable instruction, not this page, is authoritative.
- No. The test requires calibrated point-light stimuli at controlled intensity, distance, and ambient lighting — none of which a consumer screen can reproduce. Online lantern tests are lookalikes. A browser screening can estimate the underlying deficiency type and severity, which is useful preparation, but it is not a FALANT result.
- Same author, different tools. The D-15 is a clinical arrangement test — order 15 colored caps by hue — that classifies the type and axis of a deficiency. The FALANT is an occupational signal-light test that asks one practical question: can you name red, green, and white lights reliably at distance? A person can fail Ishihara, show a mild axis on the D-15, and still pass the FALANT.